Veste

Upheld: unsatisfactory quality of goods supplied under hire purchase agreement complaint against N.I.I.B. Group Limited trading as Northridge Finance

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6391113 of 2026-06-09T00:00:00+00:00. unsatisfactory quality of goods supplied under hire purchase agreement complaint against N.I.I.B. Group Limited trading as Northridge Finance. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6391113
Decision date2026-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
FirmN.I.I.B. Group Limited trading as Northridge Finance
ProductMotor finance (PCP / HP)
Claim typeunsatisfactory quality of goods supplied under hire purchase agreement
OutcomeUpheld
Remedy1. End the hire purchase agreement; 2. Collect the car without charging for collection; 3. Keep all monthly repayments made and due until collection; 4. Refund advance payment of £1,075; 5. Refund taxi costs of approximately £120 upon proof of payment; 6. Add 8% simple interest per year to all refunded amounts from date of payment to settlement; 7. Pay £200 compensation for distress and inconvenience; 8. Remove adverse credit file information and mark agreement as settled in full, not as voluntary termination.

Summary

Mr K purchased a five-year-old used car with 78,657 miles via hire purchase from Northridge Finance in January 2025 for approximately £12,222. Within a month, he reported severe vibration above 60 mph. The supply dealership conducted inspections and repairs but found no issues, while an independent engineer's report later confirmed an abnormal vibration likely related to transmission or final drive problems. The ombudsman found the car was of unsatisfactory quality at point of supply and upheld Mr K's complaint, directing NF to end the agreement, collect the car, refund the advance payment of £1,075 plus taxi costs and £200 compensation, and remove adverse credit file information.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that while the car was used and some wear and tear was expected, a reasonable person would not expect significant faults such as the vibration issue to develop so soon after supply given the car's age, mileage, and price. The vibration was reported less than a month after supply, indicating it was likely present or developing at point of supply. The independent engineer's report supported this conclusion. Although the supply dealership inspections found no fault, Mr K had given multiple opportunities to repair which were unsuccessful. The ombudsman concluded NF failed to meet their responsibility to supply goods of satisfactory quality and that Mr K was entitled to reject the car under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
N.I.I.B. Group Limited trading as Northridge Finance, all decisions1146%
Motor finance (PCP / HP), all decisions18,52138%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website