Not upheld: interest rates on savings products; misleading information complaint against National Savings and Investments (NS&I)
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6353877 of 2026-05-27T00:00:00+00:00. interest rates on savings products; misleading information complaint against National Savings and Investments (NS&I). Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6353877 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-27T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | National Savings and Investments (NS&I) |
| Product | savings |
| Claim type | interest rates on savings products; misleading information |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | NS&I to pay Mr R £50 compensation for distress and inconvenience caused by misleading information in the final response letter. |
Summary
Mr R complained about low interest rates earned on Index Linked Savings Certificates and Fixed Interest Savings Certificates purchased from NS&I in 1992. After the five-year fixed periods ended in 1997, the FISC rate fell to as low as 0.30% over the decades. Mr R discovered this in February 2025 and complained. The ombudsman found NS&I was entitled to set its own rates and had provided clear information about the accounts and applicable rates through letters and responses to enquiries over the years. NS&I also demonstrated fair value assessment under the FCA's Consumer Duty from 31 July 2024 onwards. The only error was misleading information in NS&I's final response letter, for which the ombudsman upheld NS&I's offer of £50 compensation.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that NS&I is entitled to set its own interest rates and was under no obligation to offer particular rates before 31 July 2024. After that date, NS&I provided confidential submissions demonstrating it assessed the products as offering fair value under the FCA's Consumer Duty. The ombudsman was satisfied that NS&I communicated clearly about the accounts, their values, and applicable rates on several occasions over the years through 'Keeping You Informed' letters and responses to Mr R's enquiries. When Mr R received clear information, he did not take action until February 2025, suggesting earlier proactive communication would not have made a difference. The only clear error was NS&I's misleading information in its final response letter regarding the purchase date and maturity dates, for which £50 compensation was appropriate.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| National Savings and Investments (NS&I), all decisions | 5 | 70% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website