Veste

Upheld: Account administration errors complaint against Xbridge Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6350013 of 2026-06-26T00:00:00+00:00. Account administration errors complaint against Xbridge Limited. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6350013
Decision date2026-06-26T00:00:00+00:00
FirmXbridge Limited
ProductOther regulated product
Claim typeAccount administration errors
OutcomeUpheld
RemedyXbridge Limited must pay Mr S £200 in compensation for distress and inconvenience caused by their error

Summary

Mr S purchased a landlord insurance policy through Xbridge in February 2025 but Xbridge failed to properly process it, leaving him uninsured. The error was discovered in October 2025, approximately eight months later. Xbridge immediately admitted the error and offered to retrospectively arrange cover while paying the additional premium, but Mr S declined and requested a refund instead. Xbridge refunded the premium and offered £200 compensation. The ombudsman upheld the complaint and required Xbridge to pay the £200, finding it fair and reasonable compensation given that Mr S experienced distress only briefly after discovering the error, and no claim had been made during the uninsured period.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman acknowledged that Xbridge's error was extremely reckless and potentially serious, but found that Xbridge took appropriate remedial action immediately upon discovery. The ombudsman reasoned that Mr S experienced distress only briefly - from discovery in October 2025 until Xbridge acknowledged the error and took ownership of consequences. The ombudsman noted that Mr S's worry was quickly allayed because no claim had been made during the uninsured period, demonstrating the risk had not materialized. The ombudsman concluded that £200 was fair and reasonable compensation for the limited period of genuine concern Mr S experienced.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Xbridge Limited, all decisions4628%
Account administration errors, all decisions26,54425%
Other regulated product, all decisions47,44930%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website