Not upheld: irresponsible lending - credit limit increases complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6342076 of 2026-05-14T00:00:00+00:00. irresponsible lending - credit limit increases complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6342076 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-14T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank |
| Product | credit card |
| Claim type | irresponsible lending - credit limit increases |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | Tesco Bank reduced the credit limit back to £10,000, arranged a three-month interest freeze, and provided Mr D with details for their Financial Assist Team. The firm also corrected the credit limit reporting with Credit Reference Agencies in February 2026. |
Summary
Mr D complained that Tesco Bank irresponsibly increased his credit card limit multiple times between 2021 and 2025 without conducting sufficient affordability checks. Tesco Bank obtained Mr D's income (£3,700-£4,200 monthly), housing costs, and credit commitments from Credit Reference Agencies, and estimated living costs at 30% of income, concluding he had disposable income of £1,170-£1,540 monthly to afford repayments of approximately £100 per month per £2,000 limit increase. The ombudsman found these checks were proportionate and the lending decisions fair, and even when reviewing Mr D's actual bank statements, concluded the increases would have been affordable. The complaint was not upheld, though the ombudsman acknowledged Tesco Bank's delayed correction of credit limit reporting and a call handler's insensitive phrasing.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that Tesco Bank's checks were proportionate to the circumstances, using CRA data for income and housing costs and statistical data (30% of income) for living costs estimates, which are specifically permitted by FCA regulations. The ombudsman was satisfied that Mr D's disposable income of approximately £1,170-£1,540 monthly was sufficient to afford sustainable repayments on the increased limits (approximately £100 per month for a £2,000 increase). Even when reviewing Mr D's actual bank statements, the ombudsman concluded the limit increases would have been found affordable. The ombudsman noted that while further checks could arguably have been done, they would not have changed the outcome.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank, all decisions | 66 | 11% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website