Not upheld: unfair charges for missing vehicle accessory complaint against Volvo Car UK Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6273418 of 2026-05-20T00:00:00+00:00. unfair charges for missing vehicle accessory complaint against Volvo Car UK Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6273418 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-20T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Volvo Car UK Limited |
| Product | vehicle hire agreement |
| Claim type | unfair charges for missing vehicle accessory |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | No further remedy required. VCUK's previous agreement to reduce the charge by £100 was noted but no additional action was ordered. |
Summary
Mr S complained that VCUK unfairly charged him £437.14 for a missing parcel shelf when he returned a hired car. Mr S claimed he had the parcel shelf available at his home and had asked the inspector to retrieve it, but was refused. VCUK maintained the parcel shelf was required to be returned with the car at collection in accordance with BVRLA guidance and applied the charge. The ombudsman found no persuasive contemporaneous evidence supporting Mr S's version of events and concluded VCUK acted reasonably in applying the charge for the missing accessory.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found no persuasive contemporaneous evidence supporting Mr S's account that he had informed the inspector the parcel shelf was available and requested time to retrieve it. The ombudsman noted that if this had occurred, it would likely have been mentioned in Mr S's earliest correspondence challenging the inspection findings. The ombudsman considered it reasonable for VCUK to expect the parcel shelf to be returned with the vehicle in accordance with BVRLA guidance and to apply a charge when it was not present at collection.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Volvo Car UK Limited, all decisions | 40 | 18% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website