Not upheld: promotional offer eligibility and timing complaint against Clydesdale Bank Plc (trading as Virgin Money)
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6262400 of 2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00. promotional offer eligibility and timing complaint against Clydesdale Bank Plc (trading as Virgin Money). Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6262400 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Clydesdale Bank Plc (trading as Virgin Money) |
| Product | credit card |
| Claim type | promotional offer eligibility and timing |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | None. The complaint was not upheld. |
Summary
Mr M complained that Virgin Money unfairly denied him a promotional credit card welcome offer of enhanced reward points. He applied for the credit card on 30 August 2025 believing he was eligible for the promotion, but Virgin Money refused to apply the points, stating the promotion only ran from 1 September 2025. Mr M argued the promotion was likely advertised earlier by third parties or affiliate marketers. The Ombudsman found no evidence supporting pre-1 September 2025 advertising and upheld Virgin Money's position that Mr M applied before the promotion began, making him ineligible. The complaint was not upheld.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The Ombudsman found that all tangible evidence showed the promotion started on 1 September 2025, and Mr M applied on 30 August 2025, making him ineligible. While Mr M's recollection may be legitimate, there was no evidence to support that the promotion was advertised before the official start date. It would be unreasonable to require Virgin Money to honour a promotional offer for someone who applied before the promotion began.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Clydesdale Bank Plc (trading as Virgin Money), all decisions | 82 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website