Not upheld: irresponsible lending complaint against Blue Motor Finance Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6241874 of 2026-04-21T00:00:00+00:00. irresponsible lending complaint against Blue Motor Finance Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6241874 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Blue Motor Finance Limited |
| Product | hire purchase agreement |
| Claim type | irresponsible lending |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | Blue Motor Finance to ensure the outstanding balance is reduced to £1,354.16 (with interest written off), offer to set up a repayment plan if needed, and remove any adverse information from Mr M's credit file once the balance is cleared. |
Summary
Mr M complained that Blue Motor Finance irresponsibly lent to him through a hire purchase agreement in October 2019 for vehicle financing, without conducting adequate affordability checks despite his self-employment status and existing debts. Blue Motor Finance upheld the complaint, acknowledging that Mr M would likely have been declined under its current credit policy, and offered to write off interest and reduce the balance to £1,354.16 to reflect fair usage for 10 months less his single payment. Mr M rejected this offer, seeking full balance write-off, credit file amendment, and compensation. The ombudsman upheld Blue Motor Finance's redress as fair and reasonable, finding that while the lending was irresponsible, Mr M should pay for the vehicle's use he received, with interest appropriately written off and adverse credit information to be removed once the balance is cleared.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman accepted that the lending was irresponsible and the complaint was rightly upheld. However, the ombudsman found it fair that Mr M should pay for the use he had of the vehicle, as he benefitted from it for 10 months. The ombudsman rejected the argument that because the agreement shouldn't have been provided, no payment should be due. The ombudsman found the proposed balance of £1,354.16 (representing fair usage cost of £1,599.33 less the £245.17 paid) reasonable, and that interest write-off was appropriate. The ombudsman also found it reasonable that adverse credit information would be removed once the balance was cleared, rather than immediately.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Blue Motor Finance Limited, all decisions | 49 | 32% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website