Veste

Not upheld: Direct Debit collection timing and fairness of payment terms complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6229745 of 2026-05-19T00:00:00+00:00. Direct Debit collection timing and fairness of payment terms complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6229745
Decision date2026-05-19T00:00:00+00:00
FirmBarclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank
Productcredit card
Claim typeDirect Debit collection timing and fairness of payment terms
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNo remedy ordered. The complaint was not upheld.

Summary

Miss P complained that Tesco Bank collected her credit card Direct Debit 5 days before the payment due date when paying the full statement balance, whereas minimum payments would be collected on the due date. She felt this was unfair and placed full-balance payers at a disadvantage. Tesco Bank explained that early collection of full statement payments (which are significantly larger) provides a buffer to address any issues before the due date. The ombudsman found that the collection date was clearly communicated on monthly statements, the policy was standard and stated, and Miss P had the option to switch to manual payments. The complaint was not upheld.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that Tesco Bank's policy of collecting full statement payments 5 calendar days before the payment due date was clearly communicated on monthly statements and was a stated standard process. The ombudsman accepted Tesco Bank's rationale that early collection of larger full statement payments provides a buffer to address insufficient funds issues before the payment due date. The ombudsman noted that the Financial Ombudsman Service cannot require a business to change its policies and processes, and that Miss P had the option to switch to manual payments if she preferred to pay on a different date.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank, all decisions5510%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website