Partially upheld: scam / fraud - failure to intervene on suspicious payments complaint against Wise Payments Limited (trading as Wise)
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6177136 of 2026-04-15T00:00:00+00:00. scam / fraud - failure to intervene on suspicious payments complaint against Wise Payments Limited (trading as Wise). Outcome: Partially upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6177136 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-15T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Wise Payments Limited (trading as Wise) |
| Product | payment services / money transfer |
| Claim type | scam / fraud - failure to intervene on suspicious payments |
| Outcome | Partially upheld |
| Remedy | Pay Mr I £2,205 plus 8% interest from 14 November 2023 to date of repayment (50% of the £4,410 total for last three payments) |
Summary
Mr I fell victim to a job scam and was persuaded to open a Wise account, transferring over £5,850 to three payees over two days in November 2023. Wise initially refused to refund but later accepted they should have intervened at the £1,150 payment. The ombudsman partially upheld the complaint, finding Wise liable for £4,410 (the last three payments) but reducing compensation by 50% to £2,205 due to Mr I's contributory negligence in not questioning the implausible scheme despite lacking a contract and being asked for upfront payment.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
While Wise should have intervened at the £1,150 payment, Mr I bears some responsibility for the loss due to contributory negligence. The scam, although sophisticated with a platform and impersonation of a legitimate company, was overall implausible. Mr I should have questioned whether the simple tasks could generate the promised returns, was not provided a contract despite claimed legitimacy, and was asked for upfront payment. These factors should have raised concerns before the final three payments. A 50% reduction in compensation is fair given the shared fault.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Wise Payments Limited (trading as Wise), all decisions | 13 | 8% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website