Upheld: unauthorised transactions / fraud complaint against eToro Money UK Ltd
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6123052 of 2026-04-30T00:00:00+00:00. unauthorised transactions / fraud complaint against eToro Money UK Ltd. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6123052 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-30T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | eToro Money UK Ltd |
| Product | payment services / electronic money account |
| Claim type | unauthorised transactions / fraud |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Refund of £1,270 for two disputed transactions (£900 and £370) plus 8% simple interest from 16 October 2024 to date of settlement |
Summary
Mrs W complained that eToro Money UK Ltd refused to refund her for two unauthorised transactions totalling £1,270 made from her money account in October 2024. The transactions occurred after Mrs W fell victim to an impersonation scam, during which a fraudster obtained a replacement eSIM for her mobile phone and gained access to her eToro accounts. eToro confirmed the compromise but argued Mrs W was grossly negligent in safeguarding her security details. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding Mrs W did not authorise the transactions and that being victim of a sophisticated scam did not constitute gross negligence. eToro was instructed to refund the £1,270 plus 8% simple interest from the date of the transactions.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that Mrs W did not authorise the two disputed transactions under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. While eToro argued gross negligence, the ombudsman determined this high bar was not met, as Mrs W was victim of a sophisticated impersonation scam and the compromise of her mobile number meant eToro was communicating with the fraudster, not Mrs W. The ombudsman was satisfied Mrs W reported the fraud promptly upon discovery and that her four-week delay in noticing the compromise was reasonable given her limited account activity.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| eToro Money UK Ltd, all decisions | 10 | 35% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website