Not upheld: account application decline and failure to provide reasons complaint against J.P. Morgan Europe Limited trading as Chase
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6039283 of 2026-05-22T00:00:00+00:00. account application decline and failure to provide reasons complaint against J.P. Morgan Europe Limited trading as Chase. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6039283 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | J.P. Morgan Europe Limited trading as Chase |
| Product | Current account |
| Claim type | account application decline and failure to provide reasons |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | None. The complaint was not upheld. |
Summary
Miss C applied for a current account with Chase on 16 July 2025 but her application was declined the same day. After reviewing her credit file and finding no adverse markers, Miss C complained that Chase failed to provide clear reasons for the decline. Chase maintained its decision and did not uphold her complaint. The ombudsman found that Chase was entitled to make this commercial decision and was not obliged to disclose specific eligibility criteria, and therefore did not uphold the complaint. Miss C subsequently opened an account with another provider.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman determined that while Chase is not obliged to open accounts for customers, it must have valid and non-discriminatory reasons for refusing. The ombudsman found Chase's decision was based on legitimate eligibility criteria and that Chase was entitled to protect its internal processes by not disclosing specific reasons. Banks are not obliged to provide reasons for commercial decisions, similar to how customers are not expected to explain their choice of bank.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| J.P. Morgan Europe Limited trading as Chase, all decisions | 34 | 16% |
| Current account, all decisions | 45,590 | 19% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website