Not upheld: failure to close account and incorrect credit file reporting complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5976351 of 2026-04-02T00:00:00+00:00. failure to close account and incorrect credit file reporting complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-5976351 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-02T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank |
| Product | Credit card |
| Claim type | failure to close account and incorrect credit file reporting |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | No additional remedy ordered. The ombudsman stated that Tesco Bank's offer of £100 compensation stands, and if not already paid, Mr B can contact Tesco Bank to arrange payment. The ombudsman did not award compensation for claimed detriment as no significant impact was evidenced. |
Summary
Mr B complained that Tesco Bank failed to close his credit card account after he settled the balance in July 2018, resulting in the account being incorrectly reported as open on his credit file until September 2025. Mr B claimed this caused significant financial detriment including declined credit applications and health impacts, and sought compensation of £5,640 to £9,400. Tesco Bank upheld the complaint and offered £100 compensation. The ombudsman did not uphold the complaint, finding that while Tesco Bank made an error, Mr B provided no evidence of significant detriment, an open account with zero balance likely benefitted his creditworthiness, and Tesco Bank took reasonable corrective action once aware of the issue.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman acknowledged Tesco Bank made an error in not closing the account in 2018 and continuing to report it as open until 2025. However, the ombudsman found no evidence of significant detriment to Mr B. The ombudsman reasoned that: (1) an open account with zero balance and up-to-date payments likely benefitted Mr B's creditworthiness rather than harmed it; (2) Mr B provided no evidence of declined credit applications or other concrete harm despite being given the opportunity; (3) even if the account had been closed in 2018, negative information would have continued to be reported for six years anyway; (4) the removal of the account from the credit file in 2025 appears to have caused any negative impact Mr B experienced, which would have occurred regardless of when Tesco Bank made the correction; and (5) Tesco Bank took reasonable steps to rectify the error once aware of it.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Tesco Bank, all decisions | 66 | 11% |
| Credit card, all decisions | 25,211 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website