Veste

Upheld: chargeback claim handling / refund claim mishandling complaint against Monzo Bank Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5965110 of 2026-04-14T00:00:00+00:00. chargeback claim handling / refund claim mishandling complaint against Monzo Bank Limited. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-5965110
Decision date2026-04-14T00:00:00+00:00
FirmMonzo Bank Limited
ProductCurrent account
Claim typechargeback claim handling / refund claim mishandling
OutcomeUpheld
RemedyMonzo must pay £446.46 (83% of £537.90) to H representing the unused portions of the booking, plus 8% simple interest from the date the chargeback claim was declined to the date of settlement.

Summary

H paid £537.90 via Monzo debit card for flights to a destination with a connecting flight in May 2025. Both onward flights were cancelled and H was returned home instead of reaching the intended destination. H raised a chargeback claim which Monzo declined, arguing that H had accepted alternative flights. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that the overall service contracted for was not fulfilled and the chargeback had reasonable prospect of success. Monzo was ordered to refund £446.46 (83% of the cost) plus 8% simple interest, as the initial outbound flight was considered used but the remaining journey was not provided.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman rejected Monzo's argument that individual flight segments or acceptance of re-routing demonstrated service fulfillment. The relevant question was whether H received the overall service paid for: return travel to the intended destination. Since H did not reach the intended destination and no suitable alternative was offered, the primary service was not provided. The return to point of departure was a consequence of service failure, not a substitute benefit. Aviation regulations support this interpretation. Therefore, the chargeback claim had reasonable prospect of success.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Monzo Bank Limited, all decisions14710%
Current account, all decisions45,59019%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website