Veste

Upheld: Account administration errors complaint against FIL Investments International

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5434625 of 2015-04-24T00:00:00+00:00. Account administration errors complaint against FIL Investments International. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-5434625
Decision date2015-04-24T00:00:00+00:00
FirmFIL Investments International
ProductSavings / ISA
Claim typeAccount administration errors
OutcomeUpheld
RemedyFIL Investments International to pay Mr P £150 within 28 days of acceptance of the decision.

Summary

Mr P complained to FIL Investments International after attempting to make four online deals on his savings account. All four were confirmed online but only three completed; the fourth failed because Mr P lacked sufficient units, though it was confirmed. By the time Mr P completed the deal through other means, prices had moved unfavourably, costing him approximately £300. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that while Mr P made an error, the online system's positive confirmation created a reasonable expectation of completion, making FIL partially liable. FIL was directed to pay £150 compensation.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

Although Mr P attempted to transfer more units than he held, the online dealing system provided positive confirmation of the transaction. Mr P could reasonably expect that a confirmed transaction would be completed. The online method was available to him and he should not be criticised for using it. The system's confirmation created a reasonable expectation of completion, making FIL partially responsible for the loss.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
FIL Investments International, all decisions714%
Account administration errors, all decisions25,84425%
Savings / ISA, all decisions7,60422%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website