Veste

Upheld: Service failures generally complaint against Gatehouse Bank Plc

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5275093 of 2025-02-12T00:00:00+00:00. Service failures generally complaint against Gatehouse Bank Plc. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-5275093
Decision date2025-02-12T00:00:00+00:00
FirmGatehouse Bank Plc
ProductSavings / ISA
Claim typeService failures generally
OutcomeUpheld
RemedyGatehouse Bank Plc to pay Mr R a further £100 compensation, making total compensation of £315.03 (comprising the original £215.03 already paid plus the additional £100).

Summary

Mr R complained that Gatehouse Bank Plc failed to pay profit due on his savings account, failed to close the account when required, and provided misleading and inaccurate information on multiple occasions between May and July 2024. Gatehouse accepted the errors and paid £215.03 in compensation and interest. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that the compensation was insufficient given the multiple failures, the considerable effort Mr R had to expend to obtain resolution, and the inadequate assistance from staff and systems. The ombudsman ordered an additional £100 compensation, bringing the total to £315.03.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman considered that while individual compensation per error would not be appropriate, the multiple opportunities Gatehouse had to correct the issue, the number and duration of calls, the considerable effort required by Mr R to obtain resolution, the inadequate staff assistance, and the non-robust systems information all pointed to insufficient compensation. The ombudsman was not satisfied Mr R would have received the money due without pursuing the complaint. Taking all factors into account, the distress was not fairly reflected in the £200 already paid, and a further £100 was reasonable and in line with FOS guidance.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Gatehouse Bank Plc, all decisions1035%
Service failures generally, all decisions32,76733%
Savings / ISA, all decisions7,66722%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website