Upheld: Account administration errors complaint against Embark Investment Services Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5122768 of 2025-07-24T00:00:00+00:00. Account administration errors complaint against Embark Investment Services Limited. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-5122768 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2025-07-24T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Embark Investment Services Limited |
| Product | Savings / ISA |
| Claim type | Account administration errors |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Pay £300 compensation to Mrs P for inconvenience and upset caused by lack of notice. Allow Mrs P to transfer her ISA to another provider without charge. |
Summary
Mrs P complained that Scottish Widows merged her two ISAs without prior notice when migrating to a new platform that only allows one ISA per customer. Scottish Widows apologized and offered £300 compensation. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that whilst the merger was inevitable, Mrs P should have been notified in advance, which would have allowed her to transfer the accounts elsewhere. The ombudsman found no financial loss resulted from the merger and upheld the £300 compensation as fair, also requiring the firm to allow free transfer to another provider if Mrs P wishes.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that whilst the merger was inevitable due to platform constraints, Scottish Widows failed in their duty to notify Mrs P beforehand. This failure was the key issue, not the merger itself. The ombudsman was satisfied that no financial loss occurred and that £300 fairly compensated for the inconvenience and upset caused by the lack of notice. The ombudsman noted that Mrs P could now transfer the account to another provider if desired, and the compensation covered any inconvenience from that process.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Embark Investment Services Limited, all decisions | 28 | 50% |
| Account administration errors, all decisions | 25,844 | 25% |
| Savings / ISA, all decisions | 7,667 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website