Not upheld: Credit file / adverse marker disputes complaint against Triodos Bank UK Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5037470 of 2024-10-17T00:00:00+00:00. Credit file / adverse marker disputes complaint against Triodos Bank UK Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-5037470 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2024-10-17T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Triodos Bank UK Limited |
| Product | Current account |
| Claim type | Credit file / adverse marker disputes |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | None. Complaint not upheld. |
Summary
Ms T complained that Triodos Bank UK Limited refused to share her credit history with Equifax, resulting in an inaccurate credit score and reduced credit opportunities. Triodos stated it reports only to Experian, the agency it uses for its own credit checks, and has no obligation to report to other agencies. The ombudsman found no regulatory requirement for lenders to report to all credit reference agencies and determined that Triodos had met its obligations. The complaint was not upheld, with the ombudsman noting that the FOS cannot instruct firms to change their processes as that authority rests with the FCA.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
There is no regulatory requirement for lenders to report credit data to all credit reference agencies. Triodos has met its obligations by reporting to Experian, the agency it uses for its own credit checks. The Financial Ombudsman Service is not the regulator and cannot instruct businesses to change their processes; that authority rests with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Triodos Bank UK Limited, all decisions | 11 | 23% |
| Credit file / adverse marker disputes, all decisions | 9,408 | 27% |
| Current account, all decisions | 48,245 | 19% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website