Upheld: Fraud reimbursement (APP scams) complaint against Caxton Payments Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-4952796 of 2024-08-07T00:00:00+00:00. Fraud reimbursement (APP scams) complaint against Caxton Payments Limited. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-4952796 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2024-08-07T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Caxton Payments Limited |
| Product | Current account |
| Claim type | Fraud reimbursement (APP scams) |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Caxton Payments Limited must rework the account to restore it to the financial position it would have been in had the disputed transactions never been debited. This includes: refunding all disputed payments (approximately £3,500), refunding any interest and fees charged because of those payments, and paying any account-rate interest that would have been credited had the balance not been reduced by the disputed payments. Redress must be completed within 28 days of notification of acceptance. |
Summary
Mr W complained that Caxton Payments Limited refused to refund approximately £3,500 in fraudulent transactions on his foreign currency account. A fraudster hacked the account in April 2021, changed the login details, ordered a new card to their address, and used it for rapid UK spending that drained the account. Mr W discovered the fraud in September 2023 when he tried to access the account for his first holiday since the pandemic and reported it immediately. Caxton refused to refund based on late reporting under chargeback rules. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding the transactions were clearly unauthorised and that fairness required setting aside the time limit given the exceptional pandemic circumstances and Caxton's failure to detect the obvious fraud indicators. Caxton was directed to refund all disputed payments plus interest and fees.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that while the Payment Services Regulations normally require reporting within 13 months, fairness and reasonableness required departing from this strict time limit in the exceptional circumstances. The account was dormant due to the unprecedented global pandemic, making it reasonable for Mr W not to access it. Caxton failed to flag the highly suspicious fraudulent activity despite their obligation to monitor for fraud. The spending pattern was clearly indicative of fraud and should have triggered Caxton's fraud detection systems. Since Caxton accepted the payments were unauthorised and the delay did not prejudice their ability to defend against authorisation claims, the time limit should be set aside.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Caxton Payments Limited, all decisions | 10 | 60% |
| Fraud reimbursement (APP scams), all decisions | 19,453 | 22% |
| Current account, all decisions | 48,245 | 19% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website