Upheld: Card / payment disputes complaint against Santander UK Plc
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6433112 of 2026-06-17T00:00:00+00:00. Card / payment disputes complaint against Santander UK Plc. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6433112 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-06-17T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Santander UK Plc |
| Product | Credit card |
| Claim type | Card / payment disputes |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Santander UK Plc must refund Mr V £111.98 plus 8% simple yearly interest payable from 1 April 2025 to the date of settlement. If Santander is required to deduct tax from the interest element, it must provide Mr V with a certificate of tax deduction. |
Summary
Mr V purchased flight tickets for £111.98 from a travel agent using his Santander credit card in April 2024. The airline cancelled the first leg of the flight scheduled for 29 December 2024, and Mr V was unable to obtain a refund from either the supplier or airline. When Mr V raised a dispute with Santander in January 2025, Santander declined both a chargeback and Section 75 claim, arguing the debtor-creditor-supplier chain was broken. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that Santander should have raised a chargeback for service not provided, as it had sufficient information by mid-February 2025 and the airline's cancellation (rather than a customer-initiated cancellation) is not subject to non-refundable booking terms. Santander was directed to refund £111.98 plus 8% interest from 1 April 2025.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that Santander should have raised a chargeback under the 'Goods or Services Not Provided' reason code because: (1) Mr V provided sufficient information by 17 December 2024 and supporting documents by 14 January 2025; (2) Santander had until 27 April 2025 to raise the chargeback (120 days from the anticipated performance date of 29 December 2024); (3) the airline's cancellation of the service constitutes a service not provided, which is distinct from a customer-initiated cancellation and therefore not subject to non-refundable booking terms; (4) under Mastercard guidance, the travel agent (supplier) is the merchant of record responsible for defending the chargeback claim; (5) the chargeback would more likely than not have succeeded; and (6) Santander's delay in requesting additional information in April 2025 was unreasonable given it already possessed the necessary documents.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Santander UK Plc, all decisions | 14,502 | 22% |
| Card / payment disputes, all decisions | 14,309 | 19% |
| Credit card, all decisions | 26,052 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website