Upheld: misinformation regarding disputed transaction claim status; chargeback handling; Section 75 claim assessment complaint against Nationwide Building Society
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6428011 of 2026-06-15T00:00:00+00:00. misinformation regarding disputed transaction claim status; chargeback handling; Section 75 claim assessment complaint against Nationwide Building Society. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6428011 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-06-15T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Nationwide Building Society |
| Product | Credit card |
| Claim type | misinformation regarding disputed transaction claim status; chargeback handling; Section 75 claim assessment |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Nationwide Building Society must pay Mr L £500 compensation in settlement of the complaint |
Summary
Mr L complained to Nationwide Building Society about its handling of a disputed transaction claim for a hotel booking made via credit card. Nationwide raised a chargeback claim which was ultimately unsuccessful, but a representative incorrectly informed Mr L that the dispute had been settled in his favour, leading Mr L to make alternative holiday arrangements using the refunded amount. When the chargeback was subsequently declined and the refund had to be recovered, Mr L suffered considerable distress and inconvenience. The ombudsman found that while Nationwide's chargeback and Section 75 claim decisions were reasonable given the hotel's non-refundable booking terms, the misinformation provided by the firm warranted compensation of £500 for the distress and inconvenience caused.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that while Nationwide's handling of the chargeback claim itself was reasonable (given the non-refundable terms of the booking), the firm's provision of incorrect information about the claim's status caused Mr L considerable distress and significant inconvenience. Although Mr L likely would have made alternative arrangements regardless due to his pre-existing concerns about the hotel, the unexpected reversal of the outcome approximately one month after being told it was successful caused substantial upset and required Mr L to review his finances and re-engage with Nationwide.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Nationwide Building Society, all decisions | 13,230 | 21% |
| Credit card, all decisions | 25,211 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website