Not upheld: Irresponsible lending complaint against Black Horse Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6417551 of 2026-07-06T00:00:00+00:00. Irresponsible lending complaint against Black Horse Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6417551 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-07-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Black Horse Limited |
| Product | Motor finance (PCP / HP) |
| Claim type | Irresponsible lending |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | None. The complaint was not upheld and no remedy was ordered. |
Summary
Mr K complained that Black Horse Limited irresponsibly provided him with a hire purchase agreement for approximately £8,400 in 2020. The ombudsman found that while Black Horse did not supply clear evidence of credit checks performed, the complainant's bank account information demonstrated no financial difficulty and indicated adequate disposable income of approximately £310 monthly after accounting for the repayments. The ombudsman concluded that if Black Horse had conducted proportionate checks, they would not have revealed unfairness in providing the credit, and therefore did not uphold the complaint.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman acknowledged that Black Horse did not supply clear evidence of performing reasonable and proportionate checks. However, the ombudsman's own review of the complainant's bank account information revealed no indicators of financial difficulty or inability to sustain repayment. The complainant's income of £1,440 monthly against essential expenditure of £920 left approximately £310 disposable income after the hire purchase repayments, suggesting the credit was affordable. The ombudsman concluded that if Black Horse had performed proportionate checks, they would likely not have revealed unfairness in providing the credit.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Black Horse Limited, all decisions | 1,462 | 27% |
| Irresponsible lending, all decisions | 30,770 | 37% |
| Motor finance (PCP / HP), all decisions | 19,529 | 38% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website