Veste

Upheld: Goods and services under S75 complaint against Santander UK Plc

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6407598 of 2026-06-17T00:00:00+00:00. Goods and services under S75 complaint against Santander UK Plc. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6407598
Decision date2026-06-17T00:00:00+00:00
FirmSantander UK Plc
ProductCredit card
Claim typeGoods and services under S75
OutcomeUpheld
RemedySantander UK Plc to pay Mr J £200 compensation for distress and inconvenience suffered.

Summary

Mr J purchased a £14,000 kitchen using a Santander credit card in August 2024 and encountered problems with the kitchen and installation. He contacted Santander on 19 February 2025 to pursue a section 75 claim, providing all necessary documents by 21 February. However, Santander did not act on the claim until 3 April 2025, a delay of approximately six weeks, without providing any explanation. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that Santander failed to handle the claim within a reasonable timescale contrary to FCA guidance and did not keep Mr J properly informed. Santander was ordered to pay £200 compensation for the distress and inconvenience caused.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that Santander failed to act on the claim for approximately six weeks without providing any explanation for the delay, despite having all necessary information in February. The FCA guidance requires credit card providers to handle section 75 claims in a reasonable timescale and explain delays. While Santander eventually took appropriate steps, an earlier intervention may have been more effective. The initial letter's phrase 'aim to investigate within eight weeks' created ambiguity but was not the key issue. The complaint was upheld because Santander did not deal with the claim within a reasonable timescale and did not keep Mr J properly informed.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Santander UK Plc, all decisions14,50222%
Goods and services under S75, all decisions19,87236%
Credit card, all decisions26,05222%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website