Veste

Not upheld: claim decline - failure to demonstrate covered loss complaint against Accredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6401165 of 2026-06-04T00:00:00+00:00. claim decline - failure to demonstrate covered loss complaint against Accredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6401165
Decision date2026-06-04T00:00:00+00:00
FirmAccredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd
ProductHome insurance
Claim typeclaim decline - failure to demonstrate covered loss
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNo remedy ordered. The ombudsman declined to award compensation for distress and inconvenience, finding that much of Mrs L's distress was due to the reasonable claim decline rather than service failures.

Summary

Mrs L claimed under her home insurance policy for damage to an underground pipe that collapsed and caused sewage flooding in her kitchen in January 2026. Accredited declined the claim, stating the damage was not caused by something external and identifiable as required by the policy's accidental damage definition. Mrs L complained, arguing Accredited had not properly investigated whether neighbouring demolition and construction work caused the damage and that the claim decline lacked fair causation analysis. The ombudsman found the claim decline was reasonable as neither engineer report identified an external and identifiable cause, and the onus was on Mrs L to demonstrate a covered loss. The ombudsman did not uphold the complaint, finding no compensation was warranted despite minor service delays and unclear communication.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that under the policy definition, accidental damage must be caused by something external and identifiable. The onus was on Mrs L to demonstrate the damage was covered. Neither engineer report identified an external and identifiable cause, and Accredited's expert engineer found no evidence of accidental damage. While Mrs L speculated about neighbour's construction work, she provided no persuasive evidence this caused the damage. Accredited did not rely on an exclusion but rather concluded Mrs L had not demonstrated a covered loss. The minor service failures (delayed update and unclear communication) did not warrant compensation as the claim decline itself was reasonable.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Accredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd, all decisions51545%
Home insurance, all decisions20,66838%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website