Veste

Not upheld: Home insurance claim disputes complaint against Accredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6394638 of 2026-07-02T00:00:00+00:00. Home insurance claim disputes complaint against Accredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6394638
Decision date2026-07-02T00:00:00+00:00
FirmAccredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd
ProductMotor insurance
Claim typeHome insurance claim disputes
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNone. The complaint was not upheld. The ombudsman advised that if Mr J is unhappy with progress since December 2025, he must first raise concerns directly with AIEL before bringing a new complaint to the FOS.

Summary

Mr J claimed on a temporary van insurance policy after his van was damaged in April 2025. AIEL declared the van a total loss but requested further verification documents due to discrepancies in Mr J's stated occupation and a motoring conviction on his licence. Mr J complained about the delay and lack of updates. The ombudsman found AIEL's enquiries were reasonable and necessary to validate the claim, that occupation is a significant rating factor, and that no avoidable delays occurred between April and December 2025. The complaint was not upheld.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that insurers are entitled to carry out reasonable enquiries to validate claims. The discrepancies in Mr J's occupation information and the motoring conviction required verification. The request for authenticated bank statements showing full account details was reasonable, as were requests for evidence of self-employment status. Occupation is a significant rating factor. AIEL was awaiting information from both Mr J and the police, so it was not in a position to progress the claim. No avoidable delays were identified between April and December 2025.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Accredited Insurance (Europe) Ltd, all decisions52345%
Home insurance claim disputes, all decisions24,37638%
Motor insurance, all decisions24,14835%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website