Veste

Not upheld: misdiagnosis and claims handling failure complaint against British Gas Insurance Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6379519 of 2026-06-09T00:00:00+00:00. misdiagnosis and claims handling failure complaint against British Gas Insurance Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6379519
Decision date2026-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
FirmBritish Gas Insurance Limited
ProductOther regulated product
Claim typemisdiagnosis and claims handling failure
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNo additional remedy ordered. The existing remedy of 70% contribution to boiler cost and £500 compensation was deemed fair and reasonable.

Summary

Mr D complained that British Gas Insurance incorrectly diagnosed his boiler fault as a faulty control board, leading him to purchase a new boiler for £4,971, when the actual issue was a blocked gas supply that British Gas failed to test for. British Gas paid 70% contribution towards the boiler and £500 compensation, but Mr D sought full reimbursement. The ombudsman found the 70% contribution and £500 compensation fair and reasonable, noting the old boiler was nearly 30 years old with obsolete parts and known service limitations, and that Mr D now has a new energy-efficient boiler despite the inconvenience and stress caused by British Gas's service failures.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman balanced the fact that Mr D was given incorrect advice and changed his boiler sooner than necessary against the reality that the boiler was at the end of its serviceable life with known limitations and obsolete parts. While acknowledging British Gas's service failures caused prolonged inconvenience, disruption, stress, and periods without heating during winter, the ombudsman found the 70% contribution and £500 compensation reasonable given that Mr D now has a new, energy-efficient boiler with full manufacturer support.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
British Gas Insurance Limited, all decisions1,87441%
Other regulated product, all decisions52,40830%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website