Upheld: credit file reporting; adverse information recording; agent responsibility complaint against Vodafone Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6347940 of 2026-05-15T00:00:00+00:00. credit file reporting; adverse information recording; agent responsibility complaint against Vodafone Limited. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6347940 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Vodafone Limited |
| Product | fixed sum loan |
| Claim type | credit file reporting; adverse information recording; agent responsibility |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Vodafone Limited directed to: (1) confirm that Mr W owes nothing further on the account; (2) record the account as partially settled on his credit file. The outstanding balance of £65.40 is waived. No additional monetary compensation ordered. |
Summary
Mr W complained that Vodafone recorded adverse information on his credit file after he fell behind on a fixed sum loan taken out in August 2022. Vodafone had passed the administration of the outstanding balance to a third party (B), which reached a partial settlement agreement with Mr W in October 2024 but failed to communicate this to Vodafone. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding that B was acting as Vodafone's agent and therefore Vodafone was responsible for honouring the agreement. The ombudsman directed Vodafone to confirm Mr W owes nothing further and to mark the account as partially settled, with the outstanding balance of £65.40 waived as fair redress. No additional compensation was ordered.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that while B gave Mr W incorrect information, B was acting as Vodafone's agent and therefore Vodafone was responsible for honouring the partial settlement agreement reached. The ombudsman considered that Vodafone waiving the outstanding balance of £65.40 constituted fair redress, particularly given that Mr W did not follow through on paying the compensation from B to Vodafone as agreed, which could have resolved the matter earlier. The ombudsman noted that although there was inconvenience caused, the steps Mr W took to mitigate the impact must also be considered.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Vodafone Limited, all decisions | 72 | 34% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website