Upheld: Motor insurance, claim handling complaint against Domestic & General Insurance Plc
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6346160 of 2026-06-19T00:00:00+00:00. Motor insurance, claim handling complaint against Domestic & General Insurance Plc. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6346160 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-06-19T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Domestic & General Insurance Plc |
| Product | Other regulated product |
| Claim type | Motor insurance, claim handling |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | D&G must consider the claim in line with their policy terms and conditions, and pay Mrs S £100 compensation for the distress and inconvenience caused by the misinformation and failure to consider the claim sooner. |
Summary
Mrs S held a D&G insurance policy covering accidental TV damage that expired on 3 November 2025. She claimed on 6 November 2025 for damage that occurred before expiry, but D&G incorrectly refused to consider the claim, stating the policy had expired. After FOS involvement, Mrs S provided evidence of the damage and when it occurred, but D&G still refused to consider it. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding D&G's misinformation and refusal to examine the evidence unfair, and required them to consider the claim in line with policy terms and pay £100 compensation.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
D&G acted unfairly by incorrectly stating on multiple occasions that Mrs S could not register a claim once the policy expired, despite her being clear from the outset that the damage occurred whilst on cover. D&G's refusal to consider the claim without examining the evidence provided was unreasonable. Mrs S's explanation for the delay in providing evidence was fair, as D&G had refused to consider the claim initially and had not requested the evidence. D&G should now consider the claim in accordance with the policy terms and conditions.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic & General Insurance Plc, all decisions | 665 | 31% |
| Motor insurance, claim handling, all decisions | 12,937 | 32% |
| Other regulated product, all decisions | 47,449 | 30% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website