Veste

Upheld: service failure in account opening and complaint handling complaint against National Westminster Bank Plc

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6335485 of 2026-05-18T00:00:00+00:00. service failure in account opening and complaint handling complaint against National Westminster Bank Plc. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6335485
Decision date2026-05-18T00:00:00+00:00
FirmNational Westminster Bank Plc
Productcurrent account
Claim typeservice failure in account opening and complaint handling
OutcomeUpheld
RemedyPay Mr T £50 compensation (if not already paid). NatWest to honour the switch incentive and backdate any lost interest on the savings account if Mr and Mrs T proceed with opening the accounts.

Summary

Mr T complained that NatWest prevented him from opening a joint account with his wife due to an active profile retained from her previous account closed 18 years earlier. Despite multiple attempts to resolve the issue through online, telephone, and branch services, NatWest failed to resolve the matter promptly and exceeded standard complaint timeframes. NatWest eventually deleted the old profile and offered £50 compensation plus the switch incentive. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding the £50 compensation fair given the service failures, though declining to address complaint handling as a regulatory matter.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that while the underlying issue with Mrs T's profile was the root cause, Mr T was entitled to fair treatment in his own complaint. NatWest failed to resolve the matter promptly through multiple channels and exceeded standard complaint timeframes. Although complaint handling is not a regulated activity, the service failures in attempting to open the account and the delays in resolution justified compensation. The £50 offer, combined with the commitment to honour the switch incentive and backdate savings interest, was deemed fair and reasonable.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
National Westminster Bank Plc, all decisions11,49019%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website