Partially upheld: account blocking and service failure - unreasonable delay in removing account block complaint against TSB Bank plc
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6306276 of 2026-04-23T00:00:00+00:00. account blocking and service failure - unreasonable delay in removing account block complaint against TSB Bank plc. Outcome: Partially upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6306276 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-23T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | TSB Bank plc |
| Product | current account |
| Claim type | account blocking and service failure - unreasonable delay in removing account block |
| Outcome | Partially upheld |
| Remedy | TSB must pay Mr B £225 in total compensation for distress and inconvenience. TSB may deduct the £75 already paid from this total, resulting in a further payment of £150. TSB also offered to reimburse any expenses or charges incurred in connection with the matter upon provision of evidence. |
Summary
Mr B complained that TSB Bank plc unfairly blocked his account after he notified it of his intention to enter a Trust Deed, and that the £150 compensation offered did not adequately reflect the distress and inconvenience caused. TSB acknowledged it should have removed the block on 20 October 2025 when it learned the Trust Deed was not progressing, but did not do so until 18 November 2025, causing a four-week delay. The ombudsman found the initial block was fair and proportionate, but upheld the complaint in part regarding the delay, determining that £225 in total compensation was fair and reasonable, representing an increase of £75 from TSB's original offer.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
While the initial account block was fair and proportionate given the Trust Deed notification, TSB's four-week delay in removing it after learning the Trust Deed was not progressing constituted a service failure. The ombudsman distinguished between distress caused by Mr B's underlying insolvency and financial difficulties versus the additional distress caused specifically by TSB's delay. The account block had limited practical impact since Mr B had no available funds and direct debits were already cancelled. However, the unnecessary delay and Mr B's effort in chasing the matter once aware of it warranted compensation beyond TSB's initial £150 offer.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| TSB Bank plc, all decisions | 3,565 | 26% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website