Veste

Upheld: incorrect credit file reporting; unfair credit markers complaint against Santander UK Plc

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6302592 of 2026-05-12T00:00:00+00:00. incorrect credit file reporting; unfair credit markers complaint against Santander UK Plc. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6302592
Decision date2026-05-12T00:00:00+00:00
FirmSantander UK Plc
Productcurrent account
Claim typeincorrect credit file reporting; unfair credit markers
OutcomeUpheld
RemedySantander must remove missed payment markers from Miss E's credit file and pay £300 compensation for distress and inconvenience. Broker fee of £1,499 not awarded.

Summary

Miss E complained that Santander incorrectly reported arrears and a default on her credit file despite repaying her overdraft as agreed. Although Santander removed the default, they retained missed payment markers. Miss E, described as vulnerable, subsequently struggled to obtain a mortgage and hired a specialist broker for £1,499. The ombudsman upheld the complaint regarding the credit markers and awarded £300 compensation, but rejected the broker fee claim due to insufficient evidence that it arose solely from Santander's credit reporting rather than other factors such as time pressure.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman upheld the complaint regarding credit file markers and compensation, as Santander's reporting was incorrect. However, the broker fee claim was rejected because there was insufficient evidence that Miss E was forced to use the specialist broker solely due to Santander's credit reporting. While the missed payment markers were confirmed on the credit file, no evidence from mortgage lenders or other brokers demonstrated that applications were rejected specifically because of Santander's reporting. The ombudsman acknowledged Miss E's need for speed and other financial considerations likely influenced her decision to use the broker.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Santander UK Plc, all decisions14,44522%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website