Veste

Upheld: claim handling delay and avoidable delays in progressing subsidence claim complaint against AXA Insurance UK Plc

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6284387 of 2026-06-08T00:00:00+00:00. claim handling delay and avoidable delays in progressing subsidence claim complaint against AXA Insurance UK Plc. Outcome: Upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6284387
Decision date2026-06-08T00:00:00+00:00
FirmAXA Insurance UK Plc
ProductHome insurance
Claim typeclaim handling delay and avoidable delays in progressing subsidence claim
OutcomeUpheld
Remedy1. Carry out further monitoring to include summer 2026 period with assessment by appropriate professional (structural engineer or similar with subsidence experience); 2. Pay necessary costs of council tax, water, electricity, gas, and building insurance premiums from 18 July 2025 to 3 November 2025 inclusive; 3. Pay cost of H's second report and August 2025 monitoring plus 8% simple interest per annum from date costs incurred to date of payment

Summary

Mr A, acting as representative of Mrs A's estate, complained about how AXA handled a subsidence claim on a property. AXA accepted the subsidence damage was covered by the policy and took steps to identify the cause and monitor movement. However, the ombudsman found AXA caused approximately 3.5 months of avoidable delay by not progressing the claim sooner after early 2025 monitoring suggested stability and by not acting quickly when further movement was discovered in August 2025. The ombudsman upheld the complaint and required AXA to: conduct extended monitoring through summer 2026 with professional assessment, pay necessary utility and council tax costs for the 3.5-month delay period, and reimburse the cost of the professional's second report and August 2025 monitoring with interest.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that while AXA's initial approach to gather monitoring data was reasonable, it should have progressed the claim sooner once early monitoring suggested stability, and should have acted more quickly when made aware of further movement in August 2025. This caused approximately 3.5 months of avoidable delay. The ombudsman determined it was fair and reasonable for AXA to compensate the estate for necessary utility and council tax costs during this period despite these not being covered by the policy, as compensation for losses directly caused by AXA's unfair handling. The ombudsman also required extended monitoring to include the summer 2026 period to capture seasonal movement patterns, with professional assessment to determine next steps.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
AXA Insurance UK Plc, all decisions3,71434%
Home insurance, all decisions20,66838%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website