Partially upheld: failure to communicate clearly; inadequate customer service regarding trust arrangement complaint against Legal and General Assurance Society Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6277662 of 2026-06-05T00:00:00+00:00. failure to communicate clearly; inadequate customer service regarding trust arrangement complaint against Legal and General Assurance Society Limited. Outcome: Partially upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6277662 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Legal and General Assurance Society Limited |
| Product | Life / income protection |
| Claim type | failure to communicate clearly; inadequate customer service regarding trust arrangement |
| Outcome | Partially upheld |
| Remedy | L&G to pay Mr J £100 compensation to acknowledge the frustration and emotional impact caused by its customer service failings in providing conflicting and inconsistent information. No direction for refund of premiums or policy extension. |
Summary
Mr J complained that L&G failed to ensure his life insurance policy trust was properly structured when set up in 2014. In 2025, Mr J discovered that as sole trustee, the trust lacked the safeguards needed to guarantee policy benefits would reach his intended beneficiary if he died. The ombudsman found L&G was not acting in an advisory capacity and had provided sufficient information at setup, but upheld the complaint because L&G gave Mr J conflicting and inconsistent information when he made enquiries in 2025 about the trust's validity and operation. The ombudsman awarded £100 compensation for the customer service failings but rejected Mr J's requests for premium refunds or policy extension.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that L&G was not acting in an advisory capacity and therefore had no obligation to ensure the trust was appropriately structured or to proactively intervene by recommending an additional trustee be appointed. The trust documentation contained sufficiently clear information flagging the consideration of appointing additional trustees and recommending Mr J seek advice. However, L&G failed to meet its regulatory obligation to communicate clearly and consistently when Mr J made enquiries in 2025, providing contradictory information about trustee requirements and the fate of policy proceeds, which exacerbated Mr J's confusion and distress.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Legal and General Assurance Society Limited, all decisions | 1,099 | 18% |
| Life / income protection, all decisions | 10,405 | 21% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website