Upheld: service failure, poor customer service, unfair treatment, failure to pay referral reward complaint against ZILCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6274884 of 2026-06-02T00:00:00+00:00. service failure, poor customer service, unfair treatment, failure to pay referral reward complaint against ZILCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6274884 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-06-02T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | ZILCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
| Product | fintech app / payment service |
| Claim type | service failure, poor customer service, unfair treatment, failure to pay referral reward |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Zilch must: (1) Resolve the issue of Mr F linking his debit card to the Zilch app and clearly explain any discrepancies if they exist; (2) Pay Mr F the referral reward for his wife's account; (3) Pay Mr F £150 compensation for distress and inconvenience caused |
Summary
Mr F complained that he could not link his debit card to Zilch's app despite multiple attempts and contact with Zilch, and that Zilch refused to pay a referral reward for his wife's account without providing evidence. Throughout the complaints process, Zilch failed to provide clear explanations for the technical errors or evidence supporting its claim that the referral link was not used. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding Zilch had provided poor service and treated Mr F unfairly, and directed Zilch to resolve the card linking issue, pay the referral reward, and compensate Mr F £150 for distress and inconvenience.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
Throughout the complaints process, Zilch failed to provide any evidence or information showing the issues were due to Mr F's actions or inaction, and failed to provide evidence that the referral link was not used. The ombudsman found that Zilch had not engaged meaningfully in the process and had treated Mr F unfairly by providing poor service, inadequate explanations, and refusing to pay the referral reward without supporting evidence. The appropriate remedy was to resolve the technical issue, pay the referral reward, and compensate for distress and inconvenience.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| ZILCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, all decisions | 76 | 53% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website