Partially upheld: interest calculation and account management; inadequate customer communication complaint against Lloyds Bank PLC
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6272668 of 2026-04-16T00:00:00+00:00. interest calculation and account management; inadequate customer communication complaint against Lloyds Bank PLC. Outcome: Partially upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6272668 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Lloyds Bank PLC |
| Product | credit card |
| Claim type | interest calculation and account management; inadequate customer communication |
| Outcome | Partially upheld |
| Remedy | Lloyds Bank PLC should pay Mrs B £75 compensation for failing to provide adequate explanation of her account balance and interest charges when she contacted them in May 2025. Lloyds has also agreed to refund all interest charged from April 2025 to August 2025, waive interest for September 2025, and refund a late payment fee applied in August 2025. |
Summary
Mrs B complained about interest charges on her Lloyds credit card account after resuming use in May 2025. The core issue involved a £303 transaction from December 2018 that was disputed but unsuccessfully challenged via chargeback in early 2019. Lloyds incorrectly continued marking this amount as 'in dispute' until October 2021, during which time no interest accrued on it. Once the 'in dispute' marker was removed in October 2021, the £303 became payable and subject to interest. The ombudsman found that interest was applied fairly and that Mrs B was not disadvantaged by the period when the amount was marked as 'in dispute'. While acknowledging that Lloyds could have provided better explanation of the account status when Mrs B contacted them in 2025, the ombudsman upheld Lloyds' offer of £75 compensation as fair and reasonable for this service shortcoming.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that interest was applied fairly to Mrs B's account once the £303 was removed from the 'in dispute' status in October 2021. While the £303 was incorrectly marked as 'in dispute', Mrs B was not made worse off during that period as no interest was charged on it. The ombudsman's jurisdiction was limited to the complaint about interest applied from May 2025 onwards, not the broader question of whether the £303 should have been on the account. The ombudsman accepted that Lloyds could have provided better explanation and support to Mrs B when she contacted them in 2025, justifying compensation for this service failing, but this did not alter the fact that interest was calculated correctly.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Lloyds Bank PLC, all decisions | 19,826 | 16% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website