Not upheld: unfair claim management and settlement; failure to provide clear explanation of claims process and decision-making complaint against AXA Insurance UK Plc
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6271538 of 2026-06-11T00:00:00+00:00. unfair claim management and settlement; failure to provide clear explanation of claims process and decision-making complaint against AXA Insurance UK Plc. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6271538 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-06-11T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | AXA Insurance UK Plc |
| Product | Motor insurance |
| Claim type | unfair claim management and settlement; failure to provide clear explanation of claims process and decision-making |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | No further action required. The £75 compensation already awarded by AXA was found to be fair and sufficient. |
Summary
Mr B complained that AXA unfairly managed and settled a third-party claim on his motor insurance policy following a minor incident with a van. AXA settled the claim finding Mr B fully liable, and Mr B disputed this decision and complained that AXA refused to provide third-party claim documentation. The ombudsman found that AXA followed fair procedures by obtaining both initial and senior legal opinions, and that the policy terms gave AXA discretion to settle claims. The ombudsman determined that third-party personal information could not be disclosed and that the £75 compensation already awarded by AXA for lack of clarity and incorrect information was fair, therefore not upholding the complaint.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that AXA followed fair procedures by obtaining both an initial and senior legal opinion on the conflicting accounts of the incident. The policy terms clearly gave AXA discretion to settle claims without Mr B's permission. The ombudsman noted that third-party personal information is not generally provided due to data protection considerations, and this would not have changed the outcome. The £75 compensation for lack of clarity and incorrect information about document provision was deemed appropriate.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| AXA Insurance UK Plc, all decisions | 3,716 | 34% |
| Motor insurance, all decisions | 23,874 | 35% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website