Veste

Not upheld: Motor insurance, total loss valuation complaint against Ageas Insurance Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6267035 of 2026-06-26T00:00:00+00:00. Motor insurance, total loss valuation complaint against Ageas Insurance Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6267035
Decision date2026-06-26T00:00:00+00:00
FirmAgeas Insurance Limited
ProductMotor insurance
Claim typeMotor insurance, total loss valuation
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNone - complaint not upheld

Summary

Mr S complained about Ageas' settlement of his commercial vehicle insurance claim following an accident that damaged his van. Ageas valued the van at £4,590, reduced it by £2,500 for pre-accident corrosion damage, and offered £2,040 after deducting the excess. The ombudsman found the valuation was fair based on trade guides and market evidence, the reduction was reasonable given repair costs would have exceeded £7,000, and the Category B write-off decision was properly supported by expert engineering assessment. The complaint was not upheld.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found the valuation of £4,590 to be fair and possibly slightly generous based on trade guide valuations and available market evidence. The £2,500 reduction for pre-accident corrosion damage was reasonable given the engineer's estimate of over £7,000 for necessary repairs, and it is standard practice for insurers to reduce settlements for pre-accident damage. The Category B write-off decision was supported by the engineer's expert opinion with no contradicting evidence presented.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Ageas Insurance Limited, all decisions3,00940%
Motor insurance, total loss valuation, all decisions3,48335%
Motor insurance, all decisions24,10335%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website