Upheld: poor customer service, failure to communicate service changes, delayed valuation provision complaint against Phoenix Life Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6257827 of 2026-04-22T00:00:00+00:00. poor customer service, failure to communicate service changes, delayed valuation provision complaint against Phoenix Life Limited. Outcome: Upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6257827 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Phoenix Life Limited |
| Product | savings endowment investment plan |
| Claim type | poor customer service, failure to communicate service changes, delayed valuation provision |
| Outcome | Upheld |
| Remedy | Phoenix Life Limited is directed to: (1) pay Mr J £50 additional compensation to acknowledge further frustration and inconvenience caused by poor communication regarding the change in valuation service; (2) ensure any previous compensation offers are paid if outstanding; (3) arrange for future valuations to be sent to Mr J by password-protected email rather than post. |
Summary
Mr J complained that Phoenix Life Limited treated him unfairly by providing valuations within 10 working days by post only, rather than the same-day phone valuations he previously received. He argued this prevented him from managing his investment effectively and that he was being treated differently from customers with policies on the new system. The ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding service failings in Phoenix's communication regarding the withdrawal of call-back services and its failure to acknowledge emails, but rejected Mr J's argument that the 10 working day timescale was unreasonable for a long-term investment. Phoenix was directed to pay £50 additional compensation and provide future valuations by password-protected email.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that while Phoenix met its 10 working day timescale for most valuations and did not entirely ignore Mr J's emails, there were service failings in communication. Phoenix failed to clearly inform Mr J that it was withdrawing the call-back service and would only provide post valuations, and failed to acknowledge his emails to the legacy team mailbox. The ombudsman rejected Mr J's argument that the 10 working day delay prevented him from making informed decisions about cashing in the policy, noting the investment is intended to be long-term and price fluctuations could occur regardless. However, the ombudsman agreed that better communication from Phoenix would have reduced Mr J's frustration and inconvenience.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Life Limited, all decisions | 1,106 | 20% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website