Veste

Not upheld: irresponsible lending and failure to support vulnerable customer complaint against PayPal UK Ltd

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6250377 of 2026-05-27T00:00:00+00:00. irresponsible lending and failure to support vulnerable customer complaint against PayPal UK Ltd. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6250377
Decision date2026-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
FirmPayPal UK Ltd
Productcredit card
Claim typeirresponsible lending and failure to support vulnerable customer
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNo remedy ordered. The complaint was not upheld. The ombudsman noted that PayPal had made a proactive offer of £250 debt reduction in October 2025, which Ms B rejected, and suggested Ms B could approach PayPal directly to request this offer be made available again.

Summary

Ms B complained to PayPal UK Ltd about irresponsible lending for a PayPal Credit account approved in November 2023 with a £1,500 limit and failure to support her as a vulnerable customer. The account defaulted in August 2025 after experiencing payment difficulties. Ms B had declared employment on her application despite having lost her job, and PayPal conducted credit reference agency checks showing a 2% debt-to-income ratio and good credit history. The ombudsman found that PayPal's proportionate affordability checks were appropriate for a new customer with a modest credit limit and that PayPal could not be attributed knowledge of Ms B's job loss given her declaration of employment. Although the ombudsman acknowledged PayPal could have intervened earlier when multiple late payment fees accumulated in 2024, this did not render the initial lending decision irresponsible. The complaint was not upheld.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman found that PayPal conducted proportionate affordability checks appropriate for a new customer with a modest credit limit, including credit reference agency searches and self-declared income information. The ombudsman rejected the investigator's view that PayPal should have reviewed bank statements, noting this was not necessary at the initial application stage. While Ms B had lost her job before applying, she declared employment on the form, so PayPal could not be attributed knowledge of her actual circumstances. The ombudsman noted that Ms B's ordinary PayPal account had been managed satisfactorily and her bank statements showed sufficient funds to cover the credit facility. Although the ombudsman acknowledged PayPal could have intervened earlier when multiple late payment fees accumulated in 2024, this did not render the initial lending decision irresponsible. The ombudsman found no evidence of unfair treatment or breach of section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
PayPal UK Ltd, all decisions23818%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website