Not upheld: incorrect recording of vehicle as total loss; administrative error complaint against Ageas Insurance Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6228884 of 2026-05-13T00:00:00+00:00. incorrect recording of vehicle as total loss; administrative error complaint against Ageas Insurance Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6228884 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-13T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Ageas Insurance Limited |
| Product | motor insurance |
| Claim type | incorrect recording of vehicle as total loss; administrative error |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | No additional remedy ordered. Ageas's payment of £750 compensation was deemed sufficient. |
Summary
Mrs C complained that Ageas Insurance incorrectly recorded her vehicle as a Category S total loss in 2022 following a damage claim. She only discovered this marker in 2026 when attempting to part-exchange the vehicle and received only £425 instead of approximately £1,325. Ageas accepted the error, removed the marker promptly, and paid £750 compensation, but refused to compensate for the lost vehicle value. The ombudsman did not uphold the complaint, finding Ageas's response reasonable and determining that Mrs C could have discovered the marker before selling the vehicle by reviewing her claim history.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that while Ageas made an error, its response was reasonable: it removed the marker promptly and offered £750 compensation for distress. The ombudsman rejected the claim for additional compensation for lost vehicle value on two grounds: (1) Mrs C could have reasonably discovered the marker before selling the vehicle by reviewing her claim history, and (2) there was insufficient evidence that she would have received £900 more without the marker. The ombudsman considered the £750 compensation generous and adequate to cover both distress and a contribution to the decreased settlement value.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Ageas Insurance Limited, all decisions | 3,003 | 40% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website