Veste

Not upheld: quote accuracy and policy availability complaint against TICORP Ltd (trading as Avanti Travel Insurance)

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6227381 of 2026-04-16T00:00:00+00:00. quote accuracy and policy availability complaint against TICORP Ltd (trading as Avanti Travel Insurance). Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-6227381
Decision date2026-04-16T00:00:00+00:00
FirmTICORP Ltd (trading as Avanti Travel Insurance)
Producttravel insurance
Claim typequote accuracy and policy availability
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyTICORP offered to apply a discount to the two policies that Mr S is able to purchase as a gesture of goodwill.

Summary

Mr S complained that TICORP would not honour an online quote for a Deluxe travel insurance policy after he completed medical screening on 14 October 2025. When he attempted to purchase the policy online, he was unable to complete the transaction and was directed to call TICORP, where he was informed his medical risk score exceeded the threshold for that policy level. The ombudsman found that TICORP's underwriting decision was reasonable and consistent with its guidelines, and that the online system's display of the unavailable quote resulted from system limitations rather than unfair conduct. No binding contract was formed because Mr S was prevented from completing the purchase, and the ombudsman did not uphold the complaint.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

The ombudsman determined that while the online system displayed a quote for an unavailable policy, this resulted from system limitations rather than unfair treatment. TICORP's underwriting decision to decline the Deluxe policy based on Mr S's medical conditions was reasonable and consistent with its guidelines. No binding contract was formed because Mr S was prevented from completing the purchase online. The ombudsman found TICORP's explanation for the system behavior reasonable and its goodwill discount offer appropriate.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
TICORP Ltd (trading as Avanti Travel Insurance), all decisions10%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website