Not upheld: alleged misinformation about mortgage overpayment treatment and application complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6168532 of 2026-05-22T00:00:00+00:00. alleged misinformation about mortgage overpayment treatment and application complaint against Barclays Bank UK PLC. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6168532 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Barclays Bank UK PLC |
| Product | mortgage |
| Claim type | alleged misinformation about mortgage overpayment treatment and application |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | Barclays Bank UK PLC must pay £200 compensation (previously offered) if not already paid. This compensation relates to the failure to provide the specific information Mr M requested in the January 2022 letter, not to the overpayment treatment itself. |
Summary
Mr M and Ms O complained that Barclays misled them about their mortgage overpayments, leading them to believe approximately £40,000 in overpayments could be used towards final settlement. They discovered close to mortgage maturity that they were short of funds for redemption. Barclays maintained that overpayments were immediately applied to reduce the mortgage balance and were reflected in the outstanding balance figures shown on statements. The ombudsman reviewed the December 2021 call recording and found that Barclays correctly explained the overpayment treatment. Although Barclays failed to provide specific information Mr M requested in a follow-up letter, the ombudsman found this was an administrative error rather than misleading advice, and the £200 compensation previously offered was fair and reasonable.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that Barclays correctly applied overpayments by immediately reducing the mortgage balance, meaning the overpayment figure shown on statements had already been deducted from the outstanding balance. The December 2021 call recording and subsequent written correspondence clearly explained this position. Although Barclays failed to provide the specific information Mr M requested in a follow-up letter, this was an administrative error rather than misleading advice about how overpayments worked. The ombudsman acknowledged the distress caused but concluded that Mr M and Ms O should have sought clarification between 2021 and the mortgage maturity date, particularly given that annual statements and redemption statement options were available.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Barclays Bank UK PLC, all decisions | 11,165 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website