Not upheld: operational error / alleged system glitch in share transfer process complaint against Interactive Investor Services Limited (IIS)
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6158627 of 2026-04-27T00:00:00+00:00. operational error / alleged system glitch in share transfer process complaint against Interactive Investor Services Limited (IIS). Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6158627 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Interactive Investor Services Limited (IIS) |
| Product | investment account / ISA |
| Claim type | operational error / alleged system glitch in share transfer process |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | None. The complaint was not upheld and IIS was not instructed to take any further action. |
Summary
Mrs R complained that IIS transferred almost all of her ISA shareholdings to her trading account instead of just her JWG holding on 2 September 2025. She claimed a system glitch caused the error, noting the platform was slow and she received a confirmation referring to 'investments' plural. IIS investigated and concluded there was no error, stating Mrs R had manually selected each shareholding and entered specific share quantities. The ombudsman upheld IIS's position, finding that the selective nature of the transfers (including partial quantities) was inconsistent with a system glitch, and that Mrs R would have needed to manually select each shareholding individually. The complaint was not upheld and no remedy was ordered.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that the specific quantities of shares transferred (including partial transfers and one shareholding not transferred at all) were inconsistent with a system glitch, which would more likely result in all shareholdings or full quantities being transferred. The ombudsman concluded that Mrs R would have needed to manually select each shareholding and input specific share quantities, and that confirmation would have been required to proceed. The timing of the transfer corresponded with Mrs R's login time, and there was insufficient evidence to suggest a system issue caused the incorrect transfer.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive Investor Services Limited (IIS), all decisions | 2 | 0% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website