Partially upheld: quality of goods and poor customer service complaint against Stellantis Financial Services UK Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6096475 of 2026-04-17T00:00:00+00:00. quality of goods and poor customer service complaint against Stellantis Financial Services UK Limited. Outcome: Partially upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6096475 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-04-17T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | Stellantis Financial Services UK Limited |
| Product | car finance |
| Claim type | quality of goods and poor customer service |
| Outcome | Partially upheld |
| Remedy | Stellantis Financial Services UK Limited to pay Mr J £300 compensation for distress and inconvenience caused by poor customer service and failure to engage with the customer. |
Summary
Mr J purchased a used car via finance from Stellantis in August 2024 and experienced multiple issues including pulling to the right, excessive vibration, and mechanical faults. Although some repairs were completed, Mr J claimed issues persisted and new faults emerged. The ombudsman found the car was initially faulty but insufficient evidence supported continuing faults, as Mr J declined an offered independent inspection. However, the complaint was partially upheld due to Stellantis's failure to respond to complaints and poor customer service, with compensation increased to £300.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found the car was initially faulty based on the breakdown report and remedial work, but determined there was insufficient evidence of continuing faults. The ombudsman noted that Mr J could reasonably have accepted the offered independent inspection and that without such inspection, there was insufficient evidence of ongoing faults. However, the ombudsman agreed that Stellantis failed to engage with Mr J and provide proper customer service, which warranted compensation for distress and inconvenience.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| Stellantis Financial Services UK Limited, all decisions | 182 | 58% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website