Not upheld: service failure, complaint handling deficiency, agent error complaint against HSBC UK Bank Plc
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6083426 of 2026-05-06T00:00:00+00:00. service failure, complaint handling deficiency, agent error complaint against HSBC UK Bank Plc. Outcome: Not upheld.
Decision detail
| Reference | DRN-6083426 |
|---|---|
| Decision date | 2026-05-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
| Firm | HSBC UK Bank Plc |
| Product | Credit card |
| Claim type | service failure, complaint handling deficiency, agent error |
| Outcome | Not upheld |
| Remedy | HSBC paid £375 compensation in recognition of poor service, delays, shortcomings in complaint handling, and distress and inconvenience caused. The ombudsman declined to order additional compensation. |
Summary
Ms C complained about HSBC's service when attempting to apply for a balance transfer via the mobile app in June 2025. The app prevented her from progressing, and when agent Y manually completed the application, he entered an incorrect account number (15 digits instead of 16), causing the balance transfer to fail and be reversed. HSBC failed to proactively notify Ms C of the reversal and provided poor complaint handling over several months, with agents unable or unwilling to investigate the issue. Although HSBC eventually identified the agent error and offered compensation of £375, Ms C sought additional compensation from the FOS. The ombudsman found HSBC's service was deficient but upheld the £375 compensation as fair and reasonable, declining to award additional amounts.
The Ombudsman's reasoning
The ombudsman found that while HSBC failed to provide a reasonable standard of service in multiple respects—including inadequate investigation of the app issue, failure to proactively notify Ms C of the reversal, poor complaint handling with issues being dismissed without explanation, and agent errors—the compensation of £375 already paid was fair and reasonable when considering the overall impact. The ombudsman rejected Ms C's approach of calculating compensation as £50 per interaction, explaining that FOS assesses compensation based on overall impact rather than per-interaction basis, and that not every interaction involved an error or poor service.
How this compares
| Group | Decisions | Uphold rate |
|---|---|---|
| HSBC UK Bank Plc, all decisions | 7,504 | 23% |
| Credit card, all decisions | 25,211 | 22% |
Source
Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website