Veste

Not upheld: General financial advice complaint against Evelyn Partners Investment Management Services Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5321514 of 2025-06-23T00:00:00+00:00. General financial advice complaint against Evelyn Partners Investment Management Services Limited. Outcome: Not upheld.

Decision detail

ReferenceDRN-5321514
Decision date2025-06-23T00:00:00+00:00
FirmEvelyn Partners Investment Management Services Limited
ProductInvestment
Claim typeGeneral financial advice
OutcomeNot upheld
RemedyNone. Bestinvest's apology for an agent incorrectly directing Mr G to complain to company F was deemed a reasonable resolution.

Summary

Mr G complained that Bestinvest charged him adviser fees through company F without providing any advisory service. Bestinvest explained the SDIS was a non-advice service where they provided research and tools, and that fees were clearly disclosed from 2015. The ombudsman found Bestinvest provided sufficient transparent information about the service, charges, and non-advisory nature, and gave Mr G multiple opportunities to review suitability and switch services. The complaint was not upheld as Bestinvest did not treat Mr G unfairly.

The Ombudsman's reasoning

Bestinvest provided clear information from 2015 onwards about what the SDIS service was (non-advice), what charges applied, and how they were paid. The documents explicitly stated no personal investment advice was provided. Mr G was given multiple opportunities to review the service suitability (2015, 2018, and 2024) and options to switch services or terminate the agreement. The firm was transparent about the dual charging structure and the purpose of their fees.

How this compares

GroupDecisionsUphold rate
Evelyn Partners Investment Management Services Limited, all decisions2234%
General financial advice, all decisions4,57836%
Investment, all decisions14,11434%

Source

Read the original decision on the Financial Ombudsman Service website